Format of relatedIdentifier: ARK, arXiv, and ISNB

[Philipp]

Table 8: Description of relatedIdentifierType in Appendix 1 to the documentation of the DataCite Metadata Schema 4.4 (DataCite Metadata Working Group, 2021, pages 54-57) gives some examples of related identifiers. As a rule, the form of the identifiers given in these examples corresponds to what Identifiers.org calls Sample ID (LUI). Here are som examples:

DOI:
relatedIdentifier (example): 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.037

IGSN:
relatedIdentifier (example): IECUR0097

ISSN:
relatedIdentifier (example): 0077-5606

However, for the identifier types ARK, arXiv, and ISNB, the format of the DataCite examples differs from the format of the Identifiers.org Sample ID (LUI):

ID Type	DataCite	Identifiers.org
ARK	ark:/13030/tqb3kh97gh8w	/53355/cl010066723
arXiv	arXiv:0706.0001	0807.4956v1
ISNB	978-3-905673-82-1	9781584885658

Therefore, I wonder which format DataCite recommends for these identifier types:

• ARK: with or without “ark:”?
• arXiv: with or without “arXiv:”?
• ISBN: with or without “-”?

Thanks!
Philipp

---

References:

DataCite Metadata Working Group. (2021). DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation for the
Publication and Citation of Research Data and Other Research Outputs. Version 4.4. DataCite e.V. https://doi.org/10.14454/3w3z-sa82

https://registry.identifiers.org/registry/ark

https://registry.identifiers.org/registry/arxiv

https://registry.identifiers.org/registry/isbn

[KellyStathis]

Hi @Philipp, thanks for raising this and outlining the differences from the Identifiers.org Sample ID (LUI) format.

We don’t enforce a specific format for RelatedIdentifiers based on the relatedIdentifierType. I took a look at our existing metadata and found that ARK is a mixed bag, but arXiv and ISBN are largely consistent with the DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation examples:

• ARK: 346 DOIs use relatedIdentifierType=ARK. Within these 346 DOIs, there are 1057 RelatedIdentifiers that have relatedIdentifierType=ARK. Of these, 47 start with “ark:” and none start with “/”. About half (520) are URLs with the ARK embedded, e.g. https://n2t.net/ark:/21547/CdS2XMOO_4107.
• arXiv: 15,850 DOIs use relatedIdentifierType=arXiv. I didn’t pull these for complete analysis, but can see that 15,118 of these DOIs have at least one RelatedIdentifier starting with “arXiv”, per DataCite’s current recommendation.
• ISBN: 269,283 DOIs use relatedIdentifierType=ISBN. From a spot check most seem to use the ISBN13 format with dashes, per current DataCite’s recommendation.

We’ve discussed whether to add validation by relatedIdentifierType to ensure consistent formatting, or to add normalization, but do not have concrete plans yet. If we do, we’ll certainly look at whether to change the format from our examples. For now, I would recommend sticking with the example format from the DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation to maximize consistency with our existing metadata.

[Philipp]

Hi @KellyStathis, sorry for the late response (I only now realized that email notifications were muted in my PID Forum settings).

Thanks for addressing the issue and for your recommendation. Sticking with the example format from the DataCite Metadata Schema Documentation make sense to me, so I’ll adapt our repository depositor and curator guidelines correspondingly.

Best, Philipp